The Impact of Political Issues on the Public Educational System
No human community can remain devoid of political intent and motivations for long, because whenever large numbers of individuals agree to live side-by-side – they are forced to decide on a governing mechanism that lends order and security to their collective social lives. Modern-day politics revolve around the conceptions of popular democratic and enforced centralized rule; and through a Spectrum Cable TV Service subscription, you can learn just how potently these systems tend to influence the general educational discourse consolidated within their respective administered territories.
The Case of Education in Dictatorial Regimes
In authoritarian countries like North Korea, Saudi Arabia, and large swaths of the former Soviet Union, school curriculums are mostly tailored by overseeing governments – often in a manner that narrowly suits their state ideologies.
- Educational institutions that operate in such places are more in the business of disseminating state propaganda in the guise of scholarship, with facts twisted in the favor of a particular agenda.
- Such a scenario represents a vicious power cycle, where the general population is ‘programmed’ in a way (from childhood up) to ensure its continued support for the governing state apparatus.
- The ideal learning outcomes of critical thinking and knowledge-seeking are not particularly (and in some cases not even remotely) given any attention to in such viciously autocratic countries.
- National politics, in these states, can be said to provide the wellspring for directly begetting educational material – which is subsequently accepted as the uncontestable factual evidence pertaining to different life issues.
- Student populations uphold rigid conceptions, and so it can be said that the societies that they spawn showcase a unified martial commitment in their seeming ‘idolization’ of the state.
With a Spectrum Cable Packages Internet subscription, you can log onto the Internet instantly, and view many articles and informative multimedia resources that detail these issues with pictorial proficiency.
And in Democratic Setups
Democratic societies, in contrast, allow the majority of their citizenry to make laws to govern their collective futures. But this does not automatically mean that what the minority has to say in such settings is necessarily wrong, and factually/rationally unsupported.
- Adjudicating between truth and falsehood requires the fulfillment of many other analytical criteria than simple consensus opinion.
- The educational fallout that is likely to ensure in modern republics largely occurs when an unreasonable majority tends to ascend to the echelons of power.
- Religious groups, in particular, have a tendency of becoming deeply (and oftentimes unjustifiably) critical of several popularly accepted scientific conceptions that conflict with their scriptural bases.
- As such, and because they normally retain the membership of significant numbers of voters within the public demographic, they tend to introduce their own theologically-grounded interpretations on certain issues into public school curriculums.
For a long time now in the United States and elsewhere (countries that you wouldn’t – as an outsider – normally equate with the popular espousal of non-scientific beliefs in their places of learning), fervent debates on the inclusion of biblical beliefs pertaining to creationism and the ‘sin’ of abortion into standard school study programs have made front page headlines in the news media.
Many conservative theists, along with their zealous representatives in state and national legislatures, have attempted to block the dissemination of countering evolutionary and Darwinian scientific beliefs from being taught to their children.
On Democracy’s saving Grace
In Democracies, however, social groups (such as humanitarian or scientific collectives with an impassioned interest in upholding proper and empirically verifiable values) are provided with the opportunity to engage in large-scale educational drives to enhance popular literacy pertaining to certain issues.
With the passage of time, they can hope to change their publics’ perception in the favor of voting for those political agents who sympathize with their viewpoints. This social privilege, in essence, is not granted to their counterparts in more authoritarian states.
The prominent cases of acceding to popular voter enfranchisement for women, the admissibility of gay marriage rights, and the grant of complete and fair political representation to black voters in the U.S give testimony to this affect.
Ensuring that Politics Do Not Adversely Influence Educational Trajectory
In many countries, several private and state run institutions have categorically banned the formation of student political organizations – which always seem to act as the borings through which heated sociocultural issues leak into the scholastic environments of schools and colleges.
These student political wings subsequently gain formal/informal affiliations with national and local & local political parties – and thereafter seek to use mechanisms of protest and violent retaliations to shift the educational discourse in their favor.
By totally curtailing their operations, academic institution managements and administrators are able to effectively neutralize the pervasive capacity of local politics from interfering with their scholarship programs.
If you want to gain more probing insights into this topic, consider subscribing to any one of the affordable Charter Spectrum Internet Price – and conducting a comprehensive web-search on this topic.